RidgeGhost wrote:This is one of the most valuable threads to pop up on this site in a long time. This is solid information and I agree with the findings.
Great post funderburk
Appreciate that RG Hope it helps a few folks
RidgeGhost wrote:This is one of the most valuable threads to pop up on this site in a long time. This is solid information and I agree with the findings.
Great post funderburk
tgreeno wrote:Another thing to add to this thread that I've found holds true. The ridges that overlook access points can be dynamite if the cover is good. I have found this to be true on more than a few occasions. Even if they are close to the road. Sometimes the furthest ridge form the road isn't always the best. As some people think.
Twenty Up wrote:Yeah buddy, I’ve noticed similar.
A key ingredient I’ve began to see has been when the ridges “match” or compound with foliage cover. Not every bench or saddle is a good spot to kill a buck, but the ones in proximity/connecting to a habitat edge or that connect various ridge systems can be dynamite.
I realized this last season, then listened to a podcast with Josh Driver and he began mentioning “compounding features” and that’s when it all clicked for me.
tgreeno wrote:Another thing to add to this thread that I've found holds true. The ridges that overlook access points can be dynamite if the cover is good. I have found this to be true on more than a few occasions. Even if they are close to the road. Sometimes the furthest ridge form the road isn't always the best. As some people think.
may21581 wrote:tgreeno wrote:Another thing to add to this thread that I've found holds true. The ridges that overlook access points can be dynamite if the cover is good. I have found this to be true on more than a few occasions. Even if they are close to the road. Sometimes the furthest ridge form the road isn't always the best. As some people think.
Couldn't agree more. With that I would like to add one thing to it though. Sound. Alot of times they bed where they can see or hear and perhaps both when referring to access trails and parking lots. One of my killing tactics is never to park close to where I will hunt reguardless if there is parking there or not. Car doors, things clinging around, talking, ect are all dead give aways. Not to mention others knowing where you are. I like to lead the others away from where I'm at.
BigRed wrote:may21581 wrote:tgreeno wrote:Another thing to add to this thread that I've found holds true. The ridges that overlook access points can be dynamite if the cover is good. I have found this to be true on more than a few occasions. Even if they are close to the road. Sometimes the furthest ridge form the road isn't always the best. As some people think.
Couldn't agree more. With that I would like to add one thing to it though. Sound. Alot of times they bed where they can see or hear and perhaps both when referring to access trails and parking lots. One of my killing tactics is never to park close to where I will hunt reguardless if there is parking there or not. Car doors, things clinging around, talking, ect are all dead give aways. Not to mention others knowing where you are. I like to lead the others away from where I'm at.
Agreed in most situations, however what are your thoughts on where there is traffic all year long? In my post earlier I mentioned how trout fishermen are constantly parking along this stretch of road and walking the creek so its not uncommon commotion, late winter through fall. I would assume they get used to as long as they don't feel threatened? Obviously if they come across my ground scent up the ridge away from the creek would be a different story. The three buck beds I found this spring are looking down toward the creek and the road. I should be ok until leaf drop coming from the bottom, after that its a risky proposition w out being spotted. Thermals are a whole other issue Im trying to tackle as well.
may21581 wrote:Twenty Up wrote:Yeah buddy, I’ve noticed similar.
A key ingredient I’ve began to see has been when the ridges “match” or compound with foliage cover. Not every bench or saddle is a good spot to kill a buck, but the ones in proximity/connecting to a habitat edge or that connect various ridge systems can be dynamite.
I realized this last season, then listened to a podcast with Josh Driver and he began mentioning “compounding features” and that’s when it all clicked for me.
Would you mind eloborating more on compound features. I believe I understand what your talking about but not 100 percent.
brancher147 wrote:BigRed wrote:may21581 wrote:tgreeno wrote:Another thing to add to this thread that I've found holds true. The ridges that overlook access points can be dynamite if the cover is good. I have found this to be true on more than a few occasions. Even if they are close to the road. Sometimes the furthest ridge form the road isn't always the best. As some people think.
Couldn't agree more. With that I would like to add one thing to it though. Sound. Alot of times they bed where they can see or hear and perhaps both when referring to access trails and parking lots. One of my killing tactics is never to park close to where I will hunt reguardless if there is parking there or not. Car doors, things clinging around, talking, ect are all dead give aways. Not to mention others knowing where you are. I like to lead the others away from where I'm at.
Agreed in most situations, however what are your thoughts on where there is traffic all year long? In my post earlier I mentioned how trout fishermen are constantly parking along this stretch of road and walking the creek so its not uncommon commotion, late winter through fall. I would assume they get used to as long as they don't feel threatened? Obviously if they come across my ground scent up the ridge away from the creek would be a different story. The three buck beds I found this spring are looking down toward the creek and the road. I should be ok until leaf drop coming from the bottom, after that its a risky proposition w out being spotted. Thermals are a whole other issue Im trying to tackle as well.
Yep they get used to sounds. The spot I mentioned is heavy trout and bass fishing and mushroom hunting and there is a campground within earshot. You can use that to your advantage for access but if that noise is heading their direction they are gone.
Twenty Up wrote:may21581 wrote:Twenty Up wrote:Yeah buddy, I’ve noticed similar.
A key ingredient I’ve began to see has been when the ridges “match” or compound with foliage cover. Not every bench or saddle is a good spot to kill a buck, but the ones in proximity/connecting to a habitat edge or that connect various ridge systems can be dynamite.
I realized this last season, then listened to a podcast with Josh Driver and he began mentioning “compounding features” and that’s when it all clicked for me.
Would you mind eloborating more on compound features. I believe I understand what your talking about but not 100 percent.
478AC55D-71E5-46BA-B1DC-3190A78A09C1.jpeg
For convinience I’ll post up this map I drew for someone else, I’ve never been to this tract.
The inside corner for example can be a good spot to catch cruising bucks, match that with a transition of pines to hardwoods or a clear cut.. and now we have a dynamite rut funnel. My interpretation of “compounding features” is when one or multiple features (topography, various forms of edges(foliage), fences, ponds/lakes/streams) come together and complement each other.
I hope I did a better job at clarifying. If not, I highly recommend Josh Driver’s podcast episodes on The Southern Outdoorsmen Podcast.
may21581 wrote:As far as the sounds goes there are different types of sound and each animal will tolerate different amounts. Some animals are conditioned to people walking trails and will lay and watch. The moment they get off the path they dart.
A well seasoned buck has probably been shot at a few times and prolly been shot before as well. They relate sounds to their past experiences. The sound of metal clinging together sounds a whole lot different than a dirt bike. Some walking carelessly through the woods sounds a whole lot different than someone trying to be quiet but really isn't.
I shot a good buck three years ago. I seen him a total of two times. The first time I seen him I wrote down every detail and watched him hit a scrape. It was near dark and a property next to public is private. Their German shepherd was barking prolly at other deer but reguardless making a racket. I watch this buck stop, he stood there for a minute and listened to this dog carry on and then proceeded to walk in the direction of the dog.
This was the biggest mistake that buck made. When he did that I instantly knew it was his main travel route and wasnt bothered by the dog. The next day we had a major rain storm and I repositioned my stand in the rain and got out. I waited a week later for the exact same conditions and i shot that buck repeating his same movement he had done the time before.
Big bucks will use anything they can do their advantage. I've personally witnessed them using owners dogs to alert them when they bark. They can tell the difference between a harmless farmer on a tractor and the sound of a tailgate closing after a hunter drags his stand out. Have you ever heard the one about a buck that was conditioned to the sound of a squeaky gate opening when hunters would access their property? All things to consider and think about. It's the small details most people dont think about that separates the 10 percenters from the rest.
may21581 wrote:Twenty Up wrote:may21581 wrote:Twenty Up wrote:Yeah buddy, I’ve noticed similar.
A key ingredient I’ve began to see has been when the ridges “match” or compound with foliage cover. Not every bench or saddle is a good spot to kill a buck, but the ones in proximity/connecting to a habitat edge or that connect various ridge systems can be dynamite.
I realized this last season, then listened to a podcast with Josh Driver and he began mentioning “compounding features” and that’s when it all clicked for me.
Would you mind eloborating more on compound features. I believe I understand what your talking about but not 100 percent.
478AC55D-71E5-46BA-B1DC-3190A78A09C1.jpeg
For convinience I’ll post up this map I drew for someone else, I’ve never been to this tract.
The inside corner for example can be a good spot to catch cruising bucks, match that with a transition of pines to hardwoods or a clear cut.. and now we have a dynamite rut funnel. My interpretation of “compounding features” is when one or multiple features (topography, various forms of edges(foliage), fences, ponds/lakes/streams) come together and complement each other.
I hope I did a better job at clarifying. If not, I highly recommend Josh Driver’s podcast episodes on The Southern Outdoorsmen Podcast.
I see what you are referring to now. Taking a closer look at your map I can see some great topo features such as multiple saddles, ridges, natural funnels with tree lines, and habitat edges.
I guess I just never heard anyone refer to it that way but yeah your spot on. So basically when one would find a spot like that, boots on the ground scouting will tell you if it's any good and in season scouting will tell you where and when to be somewhere. Example acorns in a certain area would be a good early fall spot, doe groups for the rut, or any bean or alfalfa fields for the opener.
Who knows you could also walk into a spot like that and find stands everywhere and beer cans all over the ground and it's a bust then for the most part.
You have a good grasp on the features and edges. Did you see how your saddles and ridges also play into your map? Pretty interesting stuff.
Just something to add and I'll shut up. Something I do is take the predominant winds for the area I'm looking at. 80 percent of the time the winds will be out of these directions. You can really narrow down some killer spots by doing this. The wind is a huge factor in how I scout.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests